Both Christianity — where they part company

Lutheranism and Quaker Christianity (Religious Society of Friends)

Close relatives, which is exactly why the 8 axes they diverge on are the interesting part. Mean distance across all seventeen axes: 0.34 (0 would be identical).

LutheranismChristianity

Salvation by grace alone through faith alone, received rather than achieved — the single sharpest position on D1 in the whole matrix. Retains sacraments and liturgy while moving authority from the hierarchy to scripture and the confessions.

Quaker Christianity (Religious Society of Friends)Christianity

The inner light in every person, reached in silence, with no clergy, no creed and no sacraments — the most thoroughly de-ritualised body in Christianity. Its authority and practice positions sit closer to Stoicism than to Catholicism, which is one of the more interesting facts the matrix surfaces.

Where they agree

  • A3 Plurality

    Both sit at strictly one — a gap of 0.03.

  • C2 Shape of time

    Both sit at one life, then judgment — a gap of 0.03.

  • D3 The body

    Both sit at between to be disciplined and to be celebrated — a gap of 0.07.

Where they part company

  • B1 Source of truth

    Lutheranism: revealed and fixed. Quaker Christianity (Religious Society of Friends): reason and direct experience. A gap of 0.73 on an axis running from “revealed and fixed” to “reason and direct experience”.

  • D2 Centrality of ritual

    Lutheranism: leaning essential and prescribed. Quaker Christianity (Religious Society of Friends): optional or absent. A gap of 0.67 on an axis running from “essential and prescribed” to “optional or absent”.

  • C3 The human condition

    Lutheranism: fallen and in need of rescue. Quaker Christianity (Religious Society of Friends): leaning ignorant but fundamentally sound. A gap of 0.60 on an axis running from “fallen and in need of rescue” to “ignorant but fundamentally sound”.

  • B3 Institutional authority

    Lutheranism: between clergy and tradition decide and individual conscience decides. Quaker Christianity (Religious Society of Friends): individual conscience decides. A gap of 0.54 on an axis running from “clergy and tradition decide” to “individual conscience decides”.

  • E1 Exclusivity

    Lutheranism: leaning one true path. Quaker Christianity (Religious Society of Friends): leaning many valid paths. A gap of 0.54 on an axis running from “one true path” to “many valid paths”.

  • B2 Reading of sacred text

    Lutheranism: leaning literal and binding. Quaker Christianity (Religious Society of Friends): leaning metaphorical, or no text at all. A gap of 0.45 on an axis running from “literal and binding” to “metaphorical, or no text at all”.

  • A4 Locus

    Lutheranism: between wholly beyond the world and fully present within it. Quaker Christianity (Religious Society of Friends): fully present within it. A gap of 0.43 on an axis running from “wholly beyond the world” to “fully present within it”.

  • D1 Mechanism of the ultimate good

    Lutheranism: given as grace. Quaker Christianity (Religious Society of Friends): between given as grace and achieved by effort or insight. A gap of 0.42 on an axis running from “given as grace” to “achieved by effort or insight”.

All seventeen axes

AxisLutheranismQuaker Christianity (Religious Society of Friends)Gap
A1 Divine realitya divine reality certainly existsleaning a divine reality certainly exists0.18
A2 Personhooda personal being one can addressleaning a personal being one can address0.25
A3 Pluralitystrictly onestrictly one0.03
A4 Locusbetween wholly beyond the world and fully present within itfully present within it0.43
B1 Source of truthrevealed and fixedreason and direct experience0.73
B2 Reading of sacred textleaning literal and bindingleaning metaphorical, or no text at all0.45
B3 Institutional authoritybetween clergy and tradition decide and individual conscience decidesindividual conscience decides0.54
C1 Survival of the selfcontinues in some formleaning continues in some form0.22
C2 Shape of timeone life, then judgmentone life, then judgment0.03
C3 The human conditionfallen and in need of rescueleaning ignorant but fundamentally sound0.60
D1 Mechanism of the ultimate goodgiven as gracebetween given as grace and achieved by effort or insight0.42
D2 Centrality of ritualleaning essential and prescribedoptional or absent0.67
D3 The bodybetween to be disciplined and to be celebratedbetween to be disciplined and to be celebrated0.07
E1 Exclusivityleaning one true pathleaning many valid paths0.54
E2 Origin of the cosmosan intentional actleaning an intentional act0.16
E3 Locus of belongingbetween a people, inherited and an individual choiceleaning an individual choice0.20
E4 Standing of natureleaning creation, given for usebetween creation, given for use and animate and itself sacred0.30

Positions for Lutheranism rest principally on The Book of Concord (1580); for Quaker Christianity (Religious Society of Friends), on Quaker Faith & Practice (Britain Yearly Meeting) and Barclay’s Apology (1678). Per-cell sources are listed on each tradition’s own page.

Which of the two is closer to you?

The questionnaire places your answers on these same axes and ranks all 65 traditions by how closely they match. Take it.