Across families

Shaivism and Vajrayana (Tibetan) Buddhism

Different families with 10 axes in close agreement — the sort of pairing a quiz weighting only the divine axes would never surface. Mean distance across all seventeen axes: 0.13 (0 would be identical).

ShaivismHinduism

Shiva as both the absolute and the immediate reality of consciousness, approached through recognition, yoga and temple practice. Spans ascetic and tantric extremes, so D3 sits mid-scale with a wide dispersion for good reason.

Vajrayana (Tibetan) BuddhismBuddhism

Mahayana aims plus tantric means: an elaborate deity practice, a guru whose authority is central, and a use of the body and the passions as the path rather than as obstacles. The most ritually dense form of Buddhism here.

Where they agree

  • B2 Reading of sacred text

    Both sit at between literal and binding and metaphorical, or no text at all — a gap of 0.02.

  • D1 Mechanism of the ultimate good

    Both sit at leaning achieved by effort or insight — a gap of 0.02.

  • B1 Source of truth

    Both sit at between revealed and fixed and reason and direct experience — a gap of 0.03.

  • A4 Locus

    Both sit at fully present within it — a gap of 0.03.

  • C2 Shape of time

    Both sit at cyclical return — a gap of 0.05.

  • C3 The human condition

    Both sit at leaning ignorant but fundamentally sound and ignorant but fundamentally sound respectively — a gap of 0.06.

  • D2 Centrality of ritual

    Both sit at essential and prescribed — a gap of 0.07.

  • E2 Origin of the cosmos

    Both sit at beginningless or natural — a gap of 0.07.

  • E4 Standing of nature

    Both sit at leaning animate and itself sacred — a gap of 0.08.

  • E1 Exclusivity

    Both sit at between one true path and many valid paths — a gap of 0.10.

Where they part company

  • A3 Plurality

    Shaivism: between strictly one and many powers and spirits. Vajrayana (Tibetan) Buddhism: leaning many powers and spirits. A gap of 0.42 on an axis running from “strictly one” to “many powers and spirits”.

  • C1 Survival of the self

    Shaivism: continues in some form. Vajrayana (Tibetan) Buddhism: between ends at death and continues in some form. A gap of 0.40 on an axis running from “ends at death” to “continues in some form”.

All seventeen axes

AxisShaivismVajrayana (Tibetan) BuddhismGap
A1 Divine realitya divine reality certainly existsleaning a divine reality certainly exists0.22
A2 Personhoodleaning a personal being one can addressbetween impersonal principle or order and a personal being one can address0.17
A3 Pluralitybetween strictly one and many powers and spiritsleaning many powers and spirits0.42
A4 Locusfully present within itfully present within it0.03
B1 Source of truthbetween revealed and fixed and reason and direct experiencebetween revealed and fixed and reason and direct experience0.03
B2 Reading of sacred textbetween literal and binding and metaphorical, or no text at allbetween literal and binding and metaphorical, or no text at all0.02
B3 Institutional authorityleaning clergy and tradition decideclergy and tradition decide0.14
C1 Survival of the selfcontinues in some formbetween ends at death and continues in some form0.40
C2 Shape of timecyclical returncyclical return0.05
C3 The human conditionleaning ignorant but fundamentally soundignorant but fundamentally sound0.06
D1 Mechanism of the ultimate goodleaning achieved by effort or insightleaning achieved by effort or insight0.02
D2 Centrality of ritualessential and prescribedessential and prescribed0.07
D3 The bodybetween to be disciplined and to be celebratedbetween to be disciplined and to be celebrated0.13
E1 Exclusivitybetween one true path and many valid pathsbetween one true path and many valid paths0.10
E2 Origin of the cosmosbeginningless or naturalbeginningless or natural0.07
E3 Locus of belongingbetween a people, inherited and an individual choicebetween a people, inherited and an individual choice0.20
E4 Standing of natureleaning animate and itself sacredleaning animate and itself sacred0.08

Positions for Shaivism rest principally on Shaiva Agamas, Tirumantiram and Kashmir Shaiva Pratyabhijna texts; for Vajrayana (Tibetan) Buddhism, on Tibetan tantric commentarial literature and Lamrim texts. Per-cell sources are listed on each tradition’s own page.

Which of the two is closer to you?

The questionnaire places your answers on these same axes and ranks all 65 traditions by how closely they match. Take it.