Across families

Existentialism and Secular Buddhism

Different families with 10 axes in close agreement — the sort of pairing a quiz weighting only the divine axes would never surface. Mean distance across all seventeen axes: 0.12 (0 would be identical).

ExistentialismPhilosophical

No given essence, no external warrant, and therefore total responsibility for what you make of yourself. The highest value in the matrix on individual conscience, and it treats that as a burden rather than as a liberation.

Secular BuddhismBuddhism

The practice and the psychology kept, the cosmology set aside: no literal rebirth, no supernatural claims, no authority beyond what you can test in your own experience. A naturalist reading of the canon rather than a rejection of it.

Where they agree

  • A2 Personhood

    Both sit at impersonal principle or order — a gap of 0.00.

  • B1 Source of truth

    Both sit at reason and direct experience — a gap of 0.00.

  • A3 Plurality

    Both sit at strictly one — a gap of 0.02.

  • E2 Origin of the cosmos

    Both sit at beginningless or natural — a gap of 0.03.

  • D1 Mechanism of the ultimate good

    Both sit at achieved by effort or insight — a gap of 0.03.

  • A1 Divine reality

    Both sit at nothing beyond the natural — a gap of 0.04.

  • E3 Locus of belonging

    Both sit at an individual choice — a gap of 0.05.

  • C1 Survival of the self

    Both sit at ends at death — a gap of 0.05.

  • B2 Reading of sacred text

    Both sit at metaphorical, or no text at all — a gap of 0.07.

  • E1 Exclusivity

    Both sit at leaning many valid paths and many valid paths respectively — a gap of 0.10.

Where they part company

  • A4 Locus

    Existentialism: leaning wholly beyond the world. Secular Buddhism: leaning fully present within it. A gap of 0.50 on an axis running from “wholly beyond the world” to “fully present within it”.

All seventeen axes

AxisExistentialismSecular BuddhismGap
A1 Divine realitynothing beyond the naturalnothing beyond the natural0.04
A2 Personhoodimpersonal principle or orderimpersonal principle or order0.00
A3 Pluralitystrictly onestrictly one0.02
A4 Locusleaning wholly beyond the worldleaning fully present within it0.50
B1 Source of truthreason and direct experiencereason and direct experience0.00
B2 Reading of sacred textmetaphorical, or no text at allmetaphorical, or no text at all0.07
B3 Institutional authorityindividual conscience decidesindividual conscience decides0.13
C1 Survival of the selfends at deathends at death0.05
C2 Shape of timeone life, then judgmentleaning one life, then judgment0.17
C3 The human conditionleaning ignorant but fundamentally soundignorant but fundamentally sound0.13
D1 Mechanism of the ultimate goodachieved by effort or insightachieved by effort or insight0.03
D2 Centrality of ritualoptional or absentleaning optional or absent0.22
D3 The bodyleaning to be celebratedbetween to be disciplined and to be celebrated0.30
E1 Exclusivityleaning many valid pathsmany valid paths0.10
E2 Origin of the cosmosbeginningless or naturalbeginningless or natural0.03
E3 Locus of belongingan individual choicean individual choice0.05
E4 Standing of naturebetween creation, given for use and animate and itself sacredbetween creation, given for use and animate and itself sacred0.20

Positions for Existentialism rest principally on Sartre, Existentialism is a Humanism; de Beauvoir, The Ethics of Ambiguity; for Secular Buddhism, on Batchelor, Buddhism Without Beliefs (1997) and After Buddhism (2015). Per-cell sources are listed on each tradition’s own page.

Which of the two is closer to you?

The questionnaire places your answers on these same axes and ranks all 65 traditions by how closely they match. Take it.