Across families

Deism and Philosophical Naturalism

Different families with 12 axes in close agreement — the sort of pairing a quiz weighting only the divine axes would never surface. Mean distance across all seventeen axes: 0.20 (0 would be identical).

DeismPhilosophical

A creator established by reason from the evidence of order, who does not intervene, answer prayer or reveal anything. The matrix minimum on immanence — this is the one tradition here whose God is genuinely absent from the world.

Philosophical NaturalismNon-theistic

The claim that the natural world is all there is, argued as a position rather than assumed as a mood. Less interested than humanism in supplying a replacement ethics, and correspondingly less pluralist about what counts as true.

Where they agree

  • B3 Institutional authority

    Both sit at individual conscience decides — a gap of 0.00.

  • E3 Locus of belonging

    Both sit at an individual choice — a gap of 0.02.

  • B2 Reading of sacred text

    Both sit at metaphorical, or no text at all — a gap of 0.03.

  • D2 Centrality of ritual

    Both sit at optional or absent — a gap of 0.03.

  • A4 Locus

    Both sit at wholly beyond the world — a gap of 0.03.

  • B1 Source of truth

    Both sit at reason and direct experience — a gap of 0.03.

  • E4 Standing of nature

    Both sit at between creation, given for use and animate and itself sacred — a gap of 0.03.

  • C3 The human condition

    Both sit at leaning ignorant but fundamentally sound — a gap of 0.04.

  • A3 Plurality

    Both sit at strictly one — a gap of 0.04.

  • D1 Mechanism of the ultimate good

    Both sit at achieved by effort or insight — a gap of 0.04.

  • D3 The body

    Both sit at between to be disciplined and to be celebrated and leaning to be celebrated respectively — a gap of 0.06.

  • C2 Shape of time

    Both sit at one life, then judgment — a gap of 0.07.

Where they part company

  • A1 Divine reality

    Deism: a divine reality certainly exists. Philosophical Naturalism: nothing beyond the natural. A gap of 0.94 on an axis running from “nothing beyond the natural” to “a divine reality certainly exists”.

  • E2 Origin of the cosmos

    Deism: an intentional act. Philosophical Naturalism: beginningless or natural. A gap of 0.93 on an axis running from “an intentional act” to “beginningless or natural”.

  • C1 Survival of the self

    Deism: between ends at death and continues in some form. Philosophical Naturalism: ends at death. A gap of 0.53 on an axis running from “ends at death” to “continues in some form”.

All seventeen axes

AxisDeismPhilosophical NaturalismGap
A1 Divine realitya divine reality certainly existsnothing beyond the natural0.94
A2 Personhoodleaning impersonal principle or orderimpersonal principle or order0.34
A3 Pluralitystrictly onestrictly one0.04
A4 Locuswholly beyond the worldwholly beyond the world0.03
B1 Source of truthreason and direct experiencereason and direct experience0.03
B2 Reading of sacred textmetaphorical, or no text at allmetaphorical, or no text at all0.03
B3 Institutional authorityindividual conscience decidesindividual conscience decides0.00
C1 Survival of the selfbetween ends at death and continues in some formends at death0.53
C2 Shape of timeone life, then judgmentone life, then judgment0.07
C3 The human conditionleaning ignorant but fundamentally soundleaning ignorant but fundamentally sound0.04
D1 Mechanism of the ultimate goodachieved by effort or insightachieved by effort or insight0.04
D2 Centrality of ritualoptional or absentoptional or absent0.03
D3 The bodybetween to be disciplined and to be celebratedleaning to be celebrated0.06
E1 Exclusivityleaning many valid pathsbetween one true path and many valid paths0.23
E2 Origin of the cosmosan intentional actbeginningless or natural0.93
E3 Locus of belongingan individual choicean individual choice0.02
E4 Standing of naturebetween creation, given for use and animate and itself sacredbetween creation, given for use and animate and itself sacred0.03

Positions for Deism rest principally on Paine, The Age of Reason (1794); Herbert of Cherbury’s common notions; for Philosophical Naturalism, on Contemporary philosophical naturalism (Dennett, Sellars, Papineau). Per-cell sources are listed on each tradition’s own page.

Which of the two is closer to you?

The questionnaire places your answers on these same axes and ranks all 65 traditions by how closely they match. Take it.